🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning average wages pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When you add those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, IT, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.